Association Between Financial Conflicts Of Interest And Positive Study Outcomes

Main Category: Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Also Included In: Pharma Industry / Biotech Industry;  Arthritis / Rheumatology
Article Date: 29 May 2011 – 2:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
<!– rate icon rate article


Patient / Public:not yet rated

Healthcare Prof:not yet rated

Results demonstrate that 91% of RCTs recording this kind of FCOI achieved a positive – outcome, compared to 66.7% of RCTs without specific FCOI (p=0.02) and adjusting for confounding factors did not change this finding.

Results of this American study demonstrate that between the two periods 2002-3 and 2006-7 there was a significant increase in the number of RA RCTs listing lead authors as receiving consulting fees/honoraria (14.6% in the first time period compared to 40% in the second (p=0.004)). FCOIs including research grants, employment by sponsoring pharmaceutical company and share ownership were disclosed by at least one author in 53.4% of the 103 eligible RCTs studied. It could be possible that the difference noted between the two periods simply reflects a natural increase in the number of authors proactively reporting conflicts of interest.

“The number of pharmaceutical treatment options for RA has increased remarkably in recent years, partly as a result of increased funding from pharmaceutical companies,” said Dr. Khan an Assistant Professor from the Division of Rheumatology at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, USA. “Our study has shown that certain FCOIs among study authors have an increased likelihood of positive outcomes favouring the sponsor‟s drug. There are many potential reasons for these results – it could be possible that more experienced clinicians hired by industry have a greater likelihood of achieving positive results because of superior trial design or that positive trials results are more likely to be published than negative ones.”

FCOIs were disclosed by at least one author in 55 of the 103 (53.4%) eligible RCTs assessed by the study authors. Forty nine (47.6%) were employed by the industry sponsor, 29 (28.2%) had received consulting fees/honoraria, 14 (13.6%) had received research grants, and 13 (12.6%) owned shares in the pharmaceutical company. However, study authors found the correlation of reporting positive outcomes was only significant in one group – for those authors receiving consulting fees/honoraria from the industry.

Study authors go on to state that “reporting of RCTs with such a high frequency of positive outcomes (72% in the overall study and approximately 90% for RCTs with authors receiving consultancy fees/honoraria or a research grant from Industry) raises ethical issues.” Dr. Khan recommends that “an RCT should only be conducted if there is substantial uncertainty about the relative value of one treatment versus another.”

The MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases were searched for original, parallel-designed RA drug trials from 2002-3 and 2006-7 with clinical primary outcomes that randomly allocated patients to different treatment groups. Search terms included „Rheumatoid Arthritis‟, „Arthritis‟, „Rheumatoid‟, with a limitation to “Clinical Trials‟ and “English‟. RCT outcome was defined as positive if a statistically significant result favoring the experimental intervention for primary outcome was found.

Abstract Number: FRI0250

Source:
Rory Berrie

European League Against Rheumatism



Bookmark and Share

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care
professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.

  Follow us on Twitter
news icon  Clinical Trials / Drug Trials headlines
email icon  email to a friend
printer icon  printer friendly version
newsletter icon  weekly newsletter
star icon  personalize your news

back to top - icon  back to top


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let
you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

MediLexicon International Ltd Logo

Privacy Policy |
Terms and Conditions


MediLexicon International Ltd
Bexhill-on-Sea, UK
MediLexicon International Ltd © 2004-2011 All rights reserved.